A series of posts that explore the issue of women in the boardroom.
Lord Davies’ report ‘Women on Boards, Feb 2011‘ opens with the quote, ‘At the current rate of change it will take over 70 years to achieve gender-balanced boardrooms in the UK.’
That’s two generations at least. Bloody hell.
I work in the heart of London City, bang in the middle of the square mile where one can smell the ambition of young men in shiny suits, I am from New Zealand where we first gave women the vote, and I am shamelssly passionate about the possibility of change. But how DO we change this? Is it as simply as mandated quotas? Will a government report REALLY spark off a revolution? Do we just have to wait until the Chairs & CEO’s who continue to recruit in their own image die?
First, lets look at where we are:
Only 3% of the UK’s Privately Held Business are led by a female CEO (the average across the European Union is 10%); across the FTSE 350, less than 9% of directorships are held by women – almost half of which were non-executives in the FTSE 100. In the FTSE 250, (often seen as a proving ground for the FTSE 100), more than half of all companies (56%) had no women on their boards, with women holding just 7% of director positions.
In a word - dire.
Lord Davies recommendations to address this pathetic level of representation are equally underwhelming. He suggests companies set targets for 2013 and 2015 to ensure that more talented and gifted women can get into the top jobs in companies across the UK. And he calls on Chief Executives to review the percentage of women they aim to have on their Executive Committees in 2013 and 2015.
There is no statutory obligation to ensure more women are at the top table, and there are no consequences for non-compliance..
As part of the report Lord Davies and his panel state that companies should fully disclose the number of women sitting on their boards and working in their organisations as a whole, to drive up the numbers of women with top jobs in business.
The report does recommend that the UK Corporate Governance Code is changed to require listed companies to establish a policy concerning boardroom diversity. This should include how they would implement such a policy, and disclose annually a summary the progress made. This is a bit more like it! There must be something behind these recommendations otherwise they get lost in the ‘would do if only we had the resource available/inclination/our Audit & Risk Committee is made entirely of men, who believe the status quo works fine, my dear’.
Next week: kicking off the revolution.









